Report a correction

Email hello@hairpipeline.com. Most useful: a link to the record, what looks wrong, and — if you have it — the source that shows it. A link to a regulatory document or a paper settles it in minutes rather than days.

A wrong phase, a wrong authorisation date, a misattributed sponsor, a trial filed against the wrong compound, a dead link, a translation that shifts the meaning — all of it. Many programmes here are barely documented outside their home country, and the likeliest error is simply a record that has fallen behind the news.

We check against the primary source, not against the coverage of it. If the correction holds, the record and its source are updated; if it does not, you get a reply explaining why. Where a correction changes how well-evidenced a record is, its confidence level moves too.

No payment is accepted to add, remove or reword a record. Discontinued programmes stay in the register, marked as such — the history of failures is as informative as the successes, and deleting it would turn this into a marketing document. A sponsor disputing a record is treated like any other source: with the document, or not at all.